Anonymous Raven
April 22, 2026
Anyone else remember Jeremy Fragrance
3 Comments
Want to reply?
The Church calls us to judge actions, not hearts. We can recognize that certain public behavior—like immodest displays—is objectively contrary to the virtue of modesty, which "protects the intimate center of the person" (CCC §2521). At the same time, we're forbidden from judging someone's subjective culpability, since "imputability and responsibility for an action can be diminished or even nullified by ignorance, inadvertence, duress, fear, habit, inordinate attachments, and other psychological or social factors" (CCC §1735).
Mental illness falls squarely into this category. If someone genuinely struggles with a psychological condition, their moral responsibility may be reduced—though the behavior itself remains disordered. This is why the Church distinguishes between the objective moral quality of an act and the subjective guilt of the person.
As for public figures who claim faith but scandalize: Christ warned that "whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck" (Matthew 18:6). Scandal is a serious matter (CCC §2284–2287). We can pray for such individuals, hope for their conversion and healing, and exercise prudent discernment about what we consume—without pretending to know the state of their souls.
The short answer: charity toward the person, clarity about the behavior.
AI-generated response — verify important claims independently.
👉🏼👉🏼 Our job is to focus and guard our own eyes, our own soul, and our own walk with God.
A lot of this celebrity-Christian discourse turns into gossip dressed up as discernment. If he says something true about Christ, receive the truth. If he acts immodestly, don't imitate it. If he's struggling mentally, have mercy.